I have sometimes been described as "brutally honest."
This could be considered bad.
I would agree that this would be bad, if I were to use the truth
to intentionally hurt people in certain situations. For example,
if someone were to give me a gift that I didn't like, I wouldn't
go out of my way to tell them how much I hated it or how terrible
it was. It is the thought that counts, and I would try to make
the best of the situation. However, I also wouldn't go on and
on making up lies about it either -- about how wonderful and perfect
it was, if it wasn't true.
So, I guess that I'm not brutally honest all of the time.
One place in life, though, where I have had to struggle recently,
is this idea of compassion. I like to think that I am a compassionate
person, and I think that I have gone out of my way to help those
who have need. I think that I have said in other places of this
website, that "Shit happens," and sometimes people need
help in dealing with what life deals them. I have always felt
that it is part of who I am and of my religious beliefs -- to
help people less fortunate than myself.
But what happens when the misfortune to the person is a direct
result of their own whims, wishes and desires? What if the bad things
that are happening to them are a direct result of the choices that
they have made? Where does my compassion lead me to in these instances?
I don't know.
If you came on here looking for an answer to this one, I don't
know that I have it for you. For me, it always seems to come down
to rationalization and the individual case - and I don't know
that that is necessarily a good thing, but that is all that I
have at this time. And lest this whole discussion seem too intellectually
"out there" I will use at least one specific example.
You will probably disagree with some of my choices, but then again,
I would be disagreeing with some of yours. So, let's see how this
plays out....and it is amazing how much guilt can play (unwittingly)
into these choices if you really think about it....
Compassion seens to be easy if it is something utterly random or
not caused at all by the person it is affecting. But unfortunately,
that is not always the case.
I know a number of people who choose not to be regularly employed
by other people (or necessarily self-employed, for that matter).
For the most part these people either make their living off of their
spirituality by selling goods and classes, or they simply don't
want to be bothered to be tied down by having a job where they have
to be responsible to someone other than themselves. I can respect
the fact that these folks have the right to make this decision.
But there are consequences to this. What happens if they become
sick and have no health care? What happens if their car breaks down?
What happens if they happen to not find enough part-time, makeshift
work to keep them fed in a particular season? What happens if they
just cycle through money problems on a regular basis?
Now, let me preface this here...in this example all of these
people to whom I am refering have employable skills and could
hold down a full-time, good-paying job if they chose to.
But they have decided that they didn't want the bother, wanting
the "freedom" instead. At what point am I obligated
to support them as a result of my compassion? At what point are
they obligated to make different choices so that others don't
have to take up their burden?
I guess I get a bit resentful. Alright, a lot resentful. I have
what I have because I work a full-time job. I don't have the time
to do everything that I would like to do. I am earning retirement,
disability, and have insurance. I have traded off a so-called
life of "freedom" for the hope of some type of other
security. I have done what I could to ensure that if something
catastrophic happened to me or my family, we have done everything
that we could to be self-sufficient.
Maybe that's the crux of the whole thing. Self-sufficiency comes
with certain amount of self-sacrifice. I don't get to do everything
that I want to do whenever I want to do it. I feel that these
other folks make choices that are very selfish. They choose to
do what they want, and then expect if something bad happens, that
the rest of us are supposed to come in and cover their butts.
But if I didn't work as hard as I did, I wouldn't have
anything to help them with! Funny, how the reverse isn't true.
Those who choose to do what they want, also don't have the resources
to help when there is a crisis. Often have I heard them fall back
on, "Well, that's sad, but I don't have a job." Or "We're
just getting by, I don't have any extra to help." Now isn't
that the ironic piece? Many of these folks expect help on a regular
basis, but use the consequences of their choices to not reciprocate.
I know that this sounds bitter, and perhaps even selfish on my
part. The classic act of compassion is to give without thought to
oneself. Isn't that the way that we have been taught? Am I supposed
to judge whether or not a person deserves my compassion? So this
begs the question on whether or not compassion is always deserving
in all cases, and I have come up with the personal answer of "No."
We were given brains and I believe that we were meant to use them.
I can differentiate between a person laid-off of a job and a person
who chooses not to have one. I can differeniate between the needs
of children in a poor home who need holiday presents despite the
fact that their parents may have made terrible choices. I can make
a difference in the life of women in the local battered women's
shelter who need supplies in order to help change their life situation.
I can tell the difference in the needs of a family who are struggling
with hospital bills because their child/father/mother has cancer
and the person in the hospital with lung cancer because they chose
to smoke 3 packs a day even when they knew it was bad for them.
I can't save everyone. I have to make choices about where I put
my resources and just who and what I support. Everyone makes these
choices. And just because someone is a Pagan doesn't mean that
they automatically go to the top of my list. And although it should
be my choice about how I support somebody in a time of crisis,
it is interesting how I've been judged by others, particularily
within the Pagan community, if I don't give as much as people
think I should - given the fact that I have a full-time job. It
is an interesting twist in the comparitive ethics of compassionate
giving!
I have always believed that if you want something to happen,
you better choose the actions that will have the consequences
that you want, because it ain't gonna happen any other way.
To those that have made poor choices and are living with the consequences
of those choices, I don't know what to say. Far from being the
cold-hearted person that I may seem here, I have, believe it or
not, actually supported some of these people. But what I have
found, is that they have not changed in the slightest. Once the
current crisis is over, they go on making the same choices, bringing
everyone, eventually back to the same place. It is interesting
that these folks think that being compassionate is to give without
expectations - regardless of the fact that they expect to be bailed
out on a somewhat regular basis! In the face of this response,
I can only believe that my supporting them is dysfunctional, not
helpful, codependent and downright unhealthy!
So now I make choices, some different than I used to, and I have
to live with the consequences of those choices. I will not fake
things to make everthing seem wonderful. I will not spend all
of my time stroking egos or pretending to be best friends with
someone I hardly know. I now refuse to bail people out of the
natural consequences of their life choices, even if it is personally
painful for me.
If I seem too brutally honest, I guess then, that I too, will
have to live with that. And I can too, since being brutally honest
in the eyes of some folks simply means that I'm not a flaky, superficial
person.
The most important thing to me is living a life of compassion
-- but not one of blind compassion. Can I live with the consequences?
Only time will tell.